My own ignorance interrupts my achievement.
One example of the author’s ignorance interrupting achievement was when counter-suing a past landlord. Had the author claimed Misrepresentation, instead of Fraud as he did, his case would have been more exact.
Though, our author should not be so hard on himself. He spoke well enough in the courtroom to have, in the middle of his testimony, opposing counsel on their own compulsions blurt out in a Mickey Mouse voice, “Your Honor, the management company made a mistake!”
To which the judge snapped back at the cowering counsel, “The management company is the landlord’s agent. Is it not!?”
“Yes, your Honor,” whimpered opposing counsel.
For forty minutes the author presented facts. When finished the judge asked, “Anything else?” The author thought of some concluding remark. To which the judges asked again, “Anything else?” The author thought of some extra remarks. “Anything else?” again asked the judge. The author was able to think of one more remark to make for his case. “Anything else?” the judge asked yet again.
The author wished he had some clue if the judge was hoping the author knew some correct conclusion. Alas, the author said, “No, your Honor.”
The judge said, “Okay, I will need some time before rendering judgment - hearing concluded.”
Opposing counsel dashed out of the courtroom.
Meanwhile, the author gathered his papers, turned to his doctor friend who came to observe the hearing and asked her how he did. She said he did well and they began to walk out of the courtroom. Before they left, they heard a voice from behind, “You did well.” They turned and saw the judge was still at his bench and again he repeated, “You did well.”
What is counter-suing?
A counter suit is the legal principle that if sued by a party you have the right to sue them, at a discount, for anything they might have done, regardless if the reasons are unrelated.